![]() I would like to highlight what I see as the key issues, but many of the other comments are important and substantive. The reviews are extensive and thoughtful, and I won’t rehash all of the details in my letter. Based on the comments of the reviewers and my independent evaluation, I found these issues to be substantial enough that I have decided to decline the manuscript. My take was largely consistent with that of the reviewers.Īlthough the issue of estimating replicability from published results is an important one, I was less convinced about the method and felt that the paper does not do enough to define the approach precisely, and it did not adequately demonstrate its benefits and limits relative to other meta-analytic bias correction techniques. I read the paper independently of the reviews, both before sending it out and again before reading the reviews (given that it had been a while). ![]() Nelson was more positive about the goals of the paper and approach, although he wasn’t entirely convinced by the approach and evidence. Reviewers 1 and 2 were both strongly negative and recommended rejection. Reviewers 1 and 2 chose to remain anonymous and Reviewer 3 is Leif Nelson (signed review). ![]() In the end, I received guidance from three expert reviewers whose comments appear at the end of this message. I initially struggled to find reviewers for the paper and I also had to wait for the final review. First, my apologies for the overly long review process. Thank you for submitting your manuscript (AMPPS-17-0114) entitled “Z-Curve: A Method for the Estimating Replicability Based on Test Statistics in Original Studies” to Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (AMPPS). This is how even meta-scientists operate. The peer-review report can be found on OSF: Īlso, three years after the p-curve authors have been alerted to the fact that their method can provide biased estimates, they have not modified their app or posted a statement that alerts readers to this problem. Meanwhile the article has been published in the journal Meta-Psychology, a journal without fees for authors, open access to articles, and transparent peer-reviews. But, here you can see how traditional publishing works (or doesn’t work). Normally, you would not be able to see the editorial decision letter or know that an author of the inferior p-curve method provided a biased review. However, this blog post shows that AMPPS works like any other traditional, for-profit, behind pay-wall journal. You might think that an article that relies on validated simulations to improve on an existing method, z-curve is better than p-curve, would be published, especially be a journal that was created to improve / advance psychological science. We also show that other methods that are already in use for effect size estimation, like p-curve, produce biased (inflated) estimates. We validated our method with simulation studies. Of course this requires that the IP address of the server never changes, there are ways to do this.Jerry Brunner and I developed a method to estimate average power of studies while taking selection for significance into account. ![]() – On every computer that want to access your site2 that is on the LAN, add these lines to its hosts file: mynewhostname a.b.c.d – find the IP address that your server PC uses, something like 192.168.0.27 Then if you want to access your site2 from elsewhere on your LAN you do this: Now add these two lines to your hosts file: mynewhostname 127.0.0.1 (Note that it is on port 80 of 127.0.0.1) #A new VirtualHostĬustomLog "C:/var/site2/logs/access.log" combined Make a sub directory for site2, also create a logs directory.Īdd a new virtualhost block to your restored nf file like this: You need to load a new set of WordPress files for the new website, it is best tyo keep them out of the “Program Files” space, the var directory will do. There are no changes necessary for your original website. This reply was modified 2 years, 4 months ago by vicentemmos.įirstly restore your original nf file. Maybe I did add a new Virtual Host correctly, after all. Have I just ruined all I’ve done so far in How do I recover it, and how do I create a new instance?Īctually, now is running normally, and is redirecting me back to. I know I’m probably missing quite a lot of information here. ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ "C:/Program Files/Ampps/combinedĪfter I did this, is now unaccessbile, and I still don’t know how to install WordPress into. I’ve modified the nf file and added the following: I’ve read the links you sent in your reply, I have a few more questions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |